Uncommon sense of the truth, or why do people like the bad guy?

Ask any hollywood actor about the role they’d next like to be cast in and its inevitably the bad guy. The reason? “It’s more fun”.

The reason why we admire the guy we’re often supposed to hate is that he’s consistent to his values, whatever they are.

Watch any budding singer nervously waiting for the panel’s response on Xfactor or Idol and it’s Simon Cowell’s opinion they all value. Hate him as you may, he’s upfront and consistent in what he says and believes.

That’s the reason we loathe so many politicians; politicians get lost in popularity contests and are haunted by the mistakes of their peers rather than motivated by the opportunity to make a difference.

Indiana Jones is the eternal heroic archetype that is the antithesis of the modern day politicians. A rougeish swashbuckler that has strong, unswerving principles yet riddle with imperfections and human weaknesses that would fill a year’s supply of tabloids.
Tony Blair epitomizes this paradox of the good guy we love to hate. With youthful zeal he took office ushering a change following 4 terms of stale and decaying political infighting. His motives were noble and his words resonated with the optimism of the time reflected in their party anthem “Things can only get better…”

Yet Blair’s downfall was no different from any professional politician - they feared making the mistake that would exocet their career.

That’s why I can’t help but admire politicians and pundits, like Cowell, who say it as it is and you can either like it or lump it. Names such as Ron Paul, George Galloway and commentators Christopher Hitchens, Noam Chomsky and Michael Moore. Whether you agree with their political standpoint or not you know exactly what you’re getting.

Hitchen’s “Love, Poverty and War” is an interesting collection of his writings. I don’t always agree with what he says but I admire his quest for finding the truth.

His opening chapter demonstrates his bravery in taking on an icon of hero worship - Winston Churchill. Common Sense holds that Churchill was a heroic, stoic leader who galvanised the masses with his wartime rhetoric. Yet, how much of this “aura” is genuine?

Obviously somewhere between 0 and 100 percent. The nub of this riff is, however, not how much is true but how people react to being inquisitive about the nature of the truth.

Our Common Sense creates a communal identity that stands challenged when tested by such questions. If, for example, Churchill wasn’t as heroic as I once thought does that itself challenge the nature of “Britishness” and thus my own identity (should I care about such things). If I did, the question would be an uncomfortable one and best shouted down.

So you have to respect the names I’ve already mentioned in having the balls to stand up for truth in the face of Common Sense constantly shouting them down. Ron Paul, for example, is on record stating that US foreign policy is the root cause of the Sep 11th terrorist attacks at a time when hysteria prevented many from making such claims for fear of being, in modern McCarthyesque terms, labelled “unpatriotic” or, worse still “siding with the terrorists”.

Hitchens is equally admirable.

He publicly is critical of religion for its influence on modern society which he sees generally as negative. “God is not great” is the title of one of his books, giving you an idea on where he stands on the whol creationist debate. I don’t agree with him on many of his points but I respect his ability to demand an open forum for enquiry which questions the rationale behind so much of our Common Sense when so many try to shout it down with emotive terms such as “unAmerican” or “blasphemous”.

It’s ironic, then, I should use a Churchill quote in summary: “the truth is incontrovertible”.

Ironically though Common Sense is often the main reason why it will never win out because the good guy, like the politician has to do everything but make a mistake and the truth is all about inviting criticism in.

Currently Reading: “Love, Property and War: Journeys and Essays” by Christopher Hitchens

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Graham Brown on Uncommon Sense

Graham Brown on Uncommon Sense and a quote from “A Path With a Heart” by Jack Kornfield.

Doing Less to Get Better Brand Results

In technology organizations, Less is definitely More.

Less technology, less organization - it’s quite simple, yet simplicity is often the most difficult thing to achieve.

For large operators such as Telenor Djuice of Norway the biggest single challenge is connecting with its most creative customers (youth) while at the same time being able to negotiate the common sense of the organization.

Here’s a presentation I gave to help them ask the right questions and free themselves from organizational “common sense” that produces common results.

Areas of interest:

* What do youth want from and think of their operators?
* Youth loyalty & churn (leading to Net Promoter Score)
* Trust Measurement as impact on Profitability
* Next Generation Brands (Red Bull, Jones Soda, EA, Scion etc)

Here’s the download for my (Graham Brown) presentation to Telenor Djuice in Oslo, October 2008 at the Djuice brand summit.

Presentation

Mobile Youth Presentation to Telenor Djuice Oct 2008

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: mobileyouth djuice)

Some of the Videos Used in the Presentation (for more mobileyouth videos go here)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do Less… of The Secret


Do Less… Guru Worship


Do Less… Other People’s Agendas (Part 2)


Do Less… Hard Work

Why work for a living?

Few would argue with the Confucian maxim "Find the job you love and you’ll never have to work another day again" yet the vast majority that catch the 0705 misery express to London Waterloo, queue in line to buy designer coffee and melt into the humdrum of a life called "work" could ever claim to have realised the addage.

My journey of discovering life beyond work has been one of letting go… mainly letting go of ego and identity associated with work. I once enjoyed the superficial fruits of my labour - a title, a company, a big car and the responsibilities and pressures that were the moniker of a CEO. Going "beyond", into a life where there is little "work", an abundance of free time and a long forgotten enjoyment of daily living is a test of the ego, or rather relinquishing its hold on our life.

A Mercedes S Class with 18" AMG Wheels won’t leave you much change out of £65,000 ($130,000). How much "work" is required to keep that car? Assume fuel, maintenance, insurance, tax etc cost you the thick end of £5,000 a year. Add to that depreciation of another £8,000 a year and you are paying £13,000 to keep the car on the road - that’s net of tax.

Some sources claim that in the "developed world", £13,400 (or $25,000) is itself enough to live on - if (importantly) you change your lifetsyle. When your outgoings are £13k per person in your household you can save some serious $$s when it comes to investing. Now once you start adding Mercs, extensions to your house, expensive work habits, travel, gym, drinks out with colleagues to your expenditure - net yearly outgoings of at least £40k ($80k) would not be uncommon. That means you’ll have to earn £70k ($140k) gross to keep your head above water.

The Merc is an exemplary case, but all cars and the "trappings" of our lifestyles are the same. We are convinced by media that unless we have such content in our lives we are not enough, so the mental "debt" effectively enslaves us to "work" for that which we don’t really need. The media manufacturerd "neuroses" is widespread .

Tom Hodginkson’s account of 9am in his excellent book "How to be Idle" provides an accurate description of working life worldwide:

"9 am is surely the most brutal and feared of all the hours in an idler’s day, for it is the time when someone, somewhere decided that work should start. Just before 9am, buses, trains, trams and roads heave with grim faced toilers as they lug themselves from one part of the town to another. Lifts sigh with large jeaned marketing executives, office girls with lots of make-up clatter through reception, recent immigrants with hard hats arrive at building sites, city boys charge up on coffee, retail workers wait outside the shop for the boss to arrive with the keys, escalators take us from an airless underworld and deposit us in equally airless offices. We read newspapers and become anxious. We have a a job. A job! Our rewards after years of education."

I remember once liking the "buzz" that pervaded the awakening city centres prior to the 9am rush. Every seemed to be going somewhere, on a mission. There was a sense of optimism. However, it wasn’t long before I realized, for the masses that sense faded soon after the first coffee of the morning wore off. Few could claim to be doing much more than "going to work".

Perhaps one reason why I enjoyed the buzz was that I was finally going to a job where I wasn’t performing menial tasks day in day out. What could be more soul-destroying that stuffing Funny Feet yoghurts into their containers, hauling backs of cements around the builder’s yard or the daily task of sticking 7000 polyurethene sheets onto battery packs that faced me every day in my youth, regardless of weather, week or will.

For most of us we lost ourselves when we transformed into "human doings", where peer group pressure lavished praise on those that were "snowed under", execs that were "on the redeye", "headhunted", "pulled into meetings" or whose schedule was "manic", "busy" or just simply "nuts!".

It isn’t a recent phenomenon associated with the "always on" road warrior either. The industrial revolution and precursory management gurus - names such as contemporary moralist Andrew Ure in his seminal work "The Philosophy of Manufactures" - actively encouraged "gain" and its the suppression of the recalcitrant individual desire for freedom through the manipulation of culture.

"…it is found nearly impossible to convert persons past the age of puberty…[there is] a need to supress the refractory tempers of the work-people accustomed to irregular paroxsysms of diligence… it is the interest of every mill-owner to organize his moral machinery on equally sound principles as his mechanical…there is in fact no case to which the Gospel truth ‘Godliness is great gain’ more applicable that the administration of an extensive factory"

We may claim freedom but we still find ourselves working 9-5pm, the hours first carved out by the mill owners and adminstrators. Culturally we may claim to have "progressed". How? We now how prozac for pets .

The "moral machinery" employed by mill owners to strike fear into the masses was the spectre of hunger and fear through losing work. Today, the fears are possession and status. Take a moment out to study the advertising and see how fear, or more importantly the fear of "not being enough" or "missing out" is core to successful marketing .

The irony is so little of this "work" in the post-industrial era, however, amounts to anything, because it is simply working, not creating.

Life outside the hamster wheel means less stress. It means having freed myself from the yoke of "work" and its taskmaster the "job", I wake up when I want (ironically I now wake up earlier without an alarm clock), working when I want, spending less, enjoying time with the family and earning more than before. Even if you still take the corporate sovereign, you can still work less and impress .

Some have experimented with taking a mini-retirement with mixed results . The key is to have tried and to gain perspective from the whole process of "stepping out".

We are mentally bound still to the habits of the Hamster Wheel but find ourselves too embedded in our comfort zones, too fearful of loss of identity in losing that title, the car and all the responsibility that goes with it.

Dutch Weavers

Life hasn’t always been like this. Ure’s earlier advice to adminstrators stems from the inherent perceived "laziness" of the pre-industrial artisans, individuals who essentially owned their own businesses, worked as they pleased and paid little heed to 9am let alone a 9-5 schedule.

There is a wonderful extract by Hodgkinson on the life of a pre-industrial weaver, the very scourge that Ure’s prescriptive tome aimed to suppress.

"Work and life were intertwined. A weaver, for example, might weave 8 or 9 yards on a rainy day.  On others, a contemporary diary tells us, he might weave just two yards before he did ’sundry jobs about the lathe and in the yard & wrote a letter in the evening’. Or he might go cherry-picking, work on a community dam, calve the cow, cut down the trees or go watch a public hanging…[The] question [is] of whether it is not a ‘natural’ human work-rhythm."

"England before the invention of the ‘dark satanic mills’", writes Hodgkinson "was a nation of idlers".

One contemporary observer, John Foster, noted with horrow how labourers having finished their work "were left with several hours in the day to be spent nearly as they please… They will… for hours together… sit on a bench, or lie down on a bank or hillock… yielded up to utter vacancy and torpor".

The irony is that as Rich Dad says "only poor people have jobs" . Financial freedom does not come from long hours worked to clear the mortgage but by the acquisition of knowledge that enables you, whatever your situation, to create the money necessary to live the lifestyle you want.

For these pleasures, those on the 0705 misery express pay good money in the form of a vacation. How many weeks or months work did that require?

Stepping outside the hamster wheel means being able to question the legitimacy of the received wisdom - the notion that happiness is intertwined with toil and the quest for "more", when ultimately doing less provides…and it’s a lot less work.

Do Less… Living without Passion


Do Less… Other People’s Agendas


Do Less… Sleeping Less

Sleep is one of life’s few unadulterated pleasures.

It’s in our sleep our subconscious mind, our real executive, manifests it’s life plans.

"Sleep on it" we’re advised. Why? Because it’s in this state we are able to piece together our cosnscious dilemmas and evoke their meanings and rational solutions albeit in a visual or semantic format.

Plus there’s no denying lying in bed feels pretty good.

But the puritans won’t let us lie without a healthy smattering of idle guilt.

"Your sleeping your life away if you’re sleeping more than 4hrs a night", Tony Robbins preached to the converted UPW congregation of which I was one. 4 hours? I was pushing 8. This was making me feel guilty.

If only I could sleep less. Imagine how productive I could be if I could get away with 3 hours a night.

We’ve all been there. And now I’ve just stopped fighting it. Apart from a few common-sense habits such as sleeping at a reasonable time and not using the computer or eating late, I’m sleeping and (importantly) getting up when I want.

When I’m not anxious about waking up at a specific time, I sleep better and often wake up early anyway. Early, I mean 7 am. My days of machoing out my coworkers by waking before 5am are long gone.

Sleep is a key part of our happiness and conditioning ourselves to get by on unnatural amounts of sleep carries long term implications for health and wellbeing.

Sleep is so important in fact that Tom Hodgkinson devotes the opening chapter of his excellent tome on doing less "How to be Idle" to the subject of sleep moreover, waking up late.
In particular how one wakes up naturally without an alarm clock. Yes, "alarm clock". Hodgkinson asks us to think on that very invention. Perhaps two of mankind’s mental jailers - the alarm and clock wedded in one frightening object.

Quoting Benjamin Franklin’s maxim "early to bed early to rise makes a man wealthy and wise", Hodgkinson reminds us how we have been conditioned from an early age by the social apparatus to associate late rising with non-productivity and guilt.

Hodgkinson cites Methodist John Wesley whose morning rise of 4am was swiftly followed by sermons on subjects such as the deadliest sin "sloth" being the murderer of time. Whilst we may find the analogies far fetched, we have done little to question the reality of our own society’s received wisdom.

We do, for example, now find ourselves in a society where long leisurely lunches that encouraged reflection, the building of relationships and perhaps a few beers being replaced by the 30 minute pit stop to refuel with anxiety - coffee and bread.

Perhaps it was anxiety associated with our inability to haul our ass into the gym everyday at 6am, because that’s the image I remember from the personal organizer advert "6am…Gym"

Perhaps it was my own earlier "issues" with enforced timing that creates the platform for this current thought train. Such was my inability as a teenager to wake that I regularly woke only 5 minutes before my ride to school. 5 minutes was obviously not enough time to get ready so I took to getting dressed, fully clothed in school uniform with tie before I went to bed.

The solution was ingenious and worked up until the point teachers smugly began to remark "Brown, for god’s sake, it looks like you’ve slept in your uniform" to the roar of the classroom.

Little did they know.

Yet if waking up early was key to our success how could Franklin account for all those struggling to keep their heads above water on the 0705 misery express to London Waterloo. Too tired to think about why they’re doing this in the first place and too scared by their freepaper about disease, terrorism, crime and market crashes to think there any consolation from taking their foot off the gas. An extra hour in bed is an extra hour of money lost.

Lest we forget Franklin gave us that great one liner "Time is Money".

Yet the contradiction inherent in the aphorism lies in its sell by date.

The days when time input equalled results output are gone all except for those performing menial labour such as farmhands, shelf stackers and most lawyers.

Results now come from the ability to take risks, creativity and making decisions not hours worked. Some of our most creative thoughts are seeded when we are lying on our back and staring at the ceiling. Having a good head on you is essential and sleep the purveyor of all mental clarity.

So here’s to turning our backs on the tyranny of peer pressure that glamorizes those who wake up before they go to bed. Thatcher slept only 3 hours a night I am often reminded. That’s exactly why we all need a good night’s sleep. Sleep well.